<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for iMurphy</title>
	<link>http://www.imurphy.com</link>
	<description>Presupposing Perspicuity</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to All Christian Walled-Gardens by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.imurphy.com/2008/03/an-open-letter-to-all-christian-walled-gardens/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.imurphy.com/2008/03/an-open-letter-to-all-christian-walled-gardens/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I hadn't heard of it.  I am reading the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_Disintegration" rel="nofollow"&gt;wikipedia article&lt;/a&gt; and'll get back you (looks interesting)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard of it.  I am reading the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_Disintegration" rel="nofollow">wikipedia article</a> and&#8217;ll get back you (looks interesting)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Open Letter to All Christian Walled-Gardens by Erin...your sister</title>
		<link>http://www.imurphy.com/2008/03/an-open-letter-to-all-christian-walled-gardens/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin...your sister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 02:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.imurphy.com/2008/03/an-open-letter-to-all-christian-walled-gardens/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Hey!  I love reading your blog...truly your intellect is dizzying.  : )  Have you heard of Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration?  I thought of you when I read about it.  : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  I love reading your blog&#8230;truly your intellect is dizzying.  : )  Have you heard of Dabrowski&#8217;s Theory of Positive Disintegration?  I thought of you when I read about it.  : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vote for Mitt by Robert Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.imurphy.com/2008/02/vote-for-mitt/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.imurphy.com/2008/02/vote-for-mitt/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Whoa, news to me!  ... Wait a minute! That guys has way to little hair to be me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, news to me!  &#8230; Wait a minute! That guys has way to little hair to be me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vote for Mitt by Mark of Meneltarma</title>
		<link>http://www.imurphy.com/2008/02/vote-for-mitt/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark of Meneltarma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.imurphy.com/2008/02/vote-for-mitt/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Hey, I was glad to see you got &lt;a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertMurphy/2008/03/08/on_those_oil_profits" rel="nofollow"&gt;syndicated on Townhall.com&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I was glad to see you got <a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertMurphy/2008/03/08/on_those_oil_profits" rel="nofollow">syndicated on Townhall.com</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not Nuking the Federal Vision by Mark R</title>
		<link>http://www.imurphy.com/2007/09/not-nuking-the-federal-vision/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.imurphy.com/2007/09/not-nuking-the-federal-vision/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>You know Robert, I am going to reread this later. You are getting my blood boiling just a bit more than I can handle right now -- don't worry, I mean that in a good way. I think you are spot-on in the last sentence and the issues of the "practical hole." Nice terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Robert, I am going to reread this later. You are getting my blood boiling just a bit more than I can handle right now &#8212; don&#8217;t worry, I mean that in a good way. I think you are spot-on in the last sentence and the issues of the &#8220;practical hole.&#8221; Nice terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Between Metanarratives and Introspection by Mark R</title>
		<link>http://www.imurphy.com/2007/11/between-metanarratives-and-introspection/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.imurphy.com/2007/11/between-metanarratives-and-introspection/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>You know it really torques me that the bible isn't a systematic theology. I mean what's with that?! Self-revelation? Redemptive history? Comon, just gimme the facts. 

:p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know it really torques me that the bible isn&#8217;t a systematic theology. I mean what&#8217;s with that?! Self-revelation? Redemptive history? Comon, just gimme the facts. </p>
<p>:p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Naturalism by Allen E. Treat</title>
		<link>http://www.imurphy.com/2007/05/naturalism/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen E. Treat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.imurphy.com/2007/05/naturalism/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>"There is a reason that Christ said of himself, “I am the truth…” Ultimately, truth is a Person, not a faceless set of facts holding sway over human life."

Christ was the truth only in that, by his admission, he was God incarnate.
That very well may have been. However the school of secular humanism
dictates that "man is God", we are imperfect, and there is sufficient evidence
to this effect. The truth, if it come's from flawed beings isn't always the truth.

People lie. That is also a fact. Not all humans are "divine" ; if we look at
Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Napoleon I wouldn't hedge my bets on the divinity of us
humans.

I won't argue Nietzsche was discredited, so was Freud and much else we postmodern types ( myself excluded ) seem to "bank" on.

Jesus also said : "Heaven and earth will pass away but my words will not pass away...". Words are just that, words. It is what we choose to believe in that dictates how we conduct ourselves in this world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is a reason that Christ said of himself, “I am the truth…” Ultimately, truth is a Person, not a faceless set of facts holding sway over human life.&#8221;</p>
<p>Christ was the truth only in that, by his admission, he was God incarnate.<br />
That very well may have been. However the school of secular humanism<br />
dictates that &#8220;man is God&#8221;, we are imperfect, and there is sufficient evidence<br />
to this effect. The truth, if it come&#8217;s from flawed beings isn&#8217;t always the truth.</p>
<p>People lie. That is also a fact. Not all humans are &#8220;divine&#8221; ; if we look at<br />
Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Napoleon I wouldn&#8217;t hedge my bets on the divinity of us<br />
humans.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t argue Nietzsche was discredited, so was Freud and much else we postmodern types ( myself excluded ) seem to &#8220;bank&#8221; on.</p>
<p>Jesus also said : &#8220;Heaven and earth will pass away but my words will not pass away&#8230;&#8221;. Words are just that, words. It is what we choose to believe in that dictates how we conduct ourselves in this world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
